From hen’s egg to serpent’s egg: Peer reviews and other attacks on science for silencing voices opposing the “climate crisis” narrative

Publishing papers that challenge conventional wisdom is not easy. I struggled to publish each one of the papers that contradict the established climate narrative. I still struggle to publish others which are being reviewed or have been rejected. The attacks may continue after publication of published papers, aiming to force publishers to retract published papers. Here I provide an example of an attack, referring to the review of a paper, in which the comments were focused on my earlier papers and used material from online attacks on them. For the history and transparency, I include the attacking comments, as well as my detailed replies to them.