On the quest for chaotic attractors in hydrological processes

D. Koutsoyiannis, On the quest for chaotic attractors in hydrological processes, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (6), 1065–1091, doi:10.1623/hysj.51.6.1065, 2006.

[doc_id=714]

[English]

In the last two decades, several researchers have claimed to have discovered low-dimensional determinism in hydrological processes, such as rainfall and runoff, using methods of chaotic analysis. Such results, however, have been criticized by others. In an attempt to offer additional insights into this discussion, it is shown here that in some cases merely the careful application of concepts of dynamical systems, without doing any calculation, provides strong indications that hydrological processes cannot be (low-dimensional) deterministic chaotic. Furthermore, it is shown that specific peculiarities of hydrological processes on fine timescales, such as asymmetric, J-shaped distribution functions, intermittency, and high autocorrelations, are synergistic factors that can lead to misleading conclusions regarding presence of (low-dimensional) deterministic chaos. In addition the recovery of a hypothetical attractor from a time series is put as a statistical estimation problem whose study allows, among others, quantification of the required sample size; this appears to be so huge that it prohibits any accurate estimation even with the largest available hydrological records. All these arguments are demonstrated using appropriately synthesized theoretical examples. Finally, in light of the theoretical analyses and arguments, typical real-world hydrometeorological time series, such as relative humidity, rainfall, and runoff, are explored and none of them is found to indicate the presence of chaos.

PDF Full text (1831 KB)

PDF Additional material:

See also: http://dx.doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.6.1065

Our works referenced by this work:

1. D. Koutsoyiannis, H. Yao, and A. Georgakakos, Multiyear behaviour and monthly simulation and forecasting of the Nile River flow, European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2006, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 8, Vienna, 05046, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.33645.38888, European Geosciences Union, 2006.

Our works that reference this work:

1. D. Koutsoyiannis, H. Yao, and A. Georgakakos, Medium-range flow prediction for the Nile: a comparison of stochastic and deterministic methods, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (1), 142–164, doi:10.1623/hysj.53.1.142, 2008.
2. D. Koutsoyiannis, A random walk on water, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14, 585–601, doi:10.5194/hess-14-585-2010, 2010.
3. S.M. Papalexiou, D. Koutsoyiannis, and A. Montanari, Can a simple stochastic model generate rich patterns of rainfall events?, Journal of Hydrology, 411 (3-4), 279–289, 2011.
4. G. Tsekouras, and D. Koutsoyiannis, Stochastic analysis and simulation of hydrometeorological processes associated with wind and solar energy, Renewable Energy, 63, 624–633, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.018, 2014.
5. D. Koutsoyiannis, P. Dimitriadis, F. Lombardo, and S. Stevens, From fractals to stochastics: Seeking theoretical consistency in analysis of geophysical data, Advances in Nonlinear Geosciences, edited by A.A. Tsonis, 237–278, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58895-7_14, Springer, 2018.

Works that cite this document: View on Google Scholar or ResearchGate

Other works that reference this work (this list might be obsolete):

1. Clark, S.E., S. Burian, R. Pitt and R. Field, Urban wet-weather flows, Water Environment Research, 79(10), 1166-1227, 2007.
2. Sivakumar, B., Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in hydrologic systems: latest developments and a look forward, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23 (7), 1027-1036, 2009.
3. Molini, A., G. G. Katul, and A. Porporato, Revisiting rainfall clustering and intermittency across different climatic regimes, Water Resour. Res., 45, W11403, doi:10.1029/2008WR007352, 2009.
4. #De Domenico, M., and M. Ali Ghorbani, Chaos and scaling in daily river flow, arxiv, 2010.
5. #Sivakumar, B., Chaos theory for hydrologic modeling and forecasting: Progress and challenges, Handbook of Research on Hydroinformatics: Technologies, Theories and Applications, 199-227, 2010.
6. Galloway, D. L., The complex future of hydrogeology, Hydrogeology Journal, 18(4), 807-810, 2010.
7. Hassan, S. A. and M. R. K. Ansari, Nonlinear analysis of seasonality and stochasticity of the Indus River, Hydrol. Sci. J., 55(2), 250–265, 2010.
8. Serinaldi, F., Multifractality, imperfect scaling and hydrological properties of rainfall time series simulated by continuous universal multifractal and discrete random cascade models, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 17, 697-714, doi: 10.5194/npg-17-697-2010, 2010.
9. #Sivakumar, B., Chaos theory for modeling environmental systems: philosophy and pragmatism, in System Identification, Environmental Modelling, and Control System Design (ed. by L. Wang and H. Garnier), Springer, London, 533-555, doi: 10.1007/978-0-85729-974-1_26, 2012.
10. Khatibi, R., B. Sivakumar, M. A. Ghorbani, O. Kisi, K. Koçak and D. F. Zadeh, Investigating chaos in river stage and discharge time series, Journal of Hydrology, 414–415, 108–117, 2012.
11. Costa, A.C., A. Bronstert and D. Kneis, Probabilistic flood forecasting for a mountainous headwater catchment using a nonparametric stochastic dynamic approach, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 57 (1), 10–25, 2012.
12. Sivakumar, B., and V. P. Singh, Hydrologic system complexity and nonlinear dynamic concepts for a catchment classification framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 4119-4131, doi: 10.5194/hess-16-4119-2012, 2012.
13. Ehret, U., H. V. Gupta, M. Sivapalan, S. V. Weijs, S. J. Schymanski, G. Blöschl, A. N. Gelfan, C. Harman, A. Kleidon, T. A. Bogaard, D. Wang, T. Wagener, U. Scherer, E. Zehe, M. F. P. Bierkens, G. Di Baldassarre, J. Parajka, L. P. H. van Beek, A. van Griensven, M. C. Westhoff and H. C. Winsemius, Advancing catchment hydrology to deal with predictions under change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 649-671, 2014.
14. Sivakumar, B., F. M. Woldemeskel and C. E. Puente, Nonlinear analysis of rainfall variability in Australia, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (1), 17-27, 2014.
15. Albostan, A., and B. Önöz, Implementation of chaotic analysis on river discharge time series, Energy and Power Engineering, 7, 81-92, 2015.

Tagged under: Determinism vs. stochasticity, Papers initially rejected, Stochastics